The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after far they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past observed.
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of your offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking about the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, because the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, instead he is acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment from the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case from the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're issue to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded as, however, we've been obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy subject matter on the approval on the competent authority.
three. I have heard the realized counsel to the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their in a position assistance.
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
two. I have heard the uncovered counsel to the parties in addition to discovered DPG at duration, perused the record and observed that:-
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only carried out if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to a person, by carrying out an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
Because of this, here only citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling another person to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-these types of neighborhood, without actually supplying them an address. Driving around the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is likely to get more frustrating than it’s value.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.